You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 101 No. 12, December 1983 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  LABORATORY SCIENCES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Descemet's Membrane in Penetrating Keratoplasties of the Human Eye

John C. Morrison, MD; Kenneth C. Swan, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1983;101(12):1927-1929.


Abstract

• The response of Descemet's membrane in penetrating keratoplasty wounds was studied by light microscopy in 23 human eyes. Although only parts of the grafted areas could be sectioned in each eye, 15 splittings, full-thickness flanges, or fragmentations of Descemet's membrane were found in ten specimens. Seven of these abnormalities resulted in incarceration of Descemet's membrane into the wound. Malapposition of the wound edges was a causative factor in two additional eyes. Six of these incarcerations produced a visible stromal wound defect. Exacting surgical apposition of the stromal edges of the graft and recipient cornea can therefore be expected to reduce, but not eliminate, these healing abnormalities. Great care must be taken in cutting the graft and removing the recipient tissue to avoid stripping the tough Descemet's membrane from the overlying softer stroma with dull instruments or overlapping cuts.



Author Affiliations

From the John E. Weeks Institute of Ophthalmology, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Nov 12, 1982.

Reprint requests to John E. Weeks Institute of Ophthalmology, Oregon Health Sciences University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR 97201 (Dr Swan).

This study was supported in part by a grant from the Medical Research Foundation of Oregon, Portland.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Surgical Reduction of Dysesthetic Blebs
Lloyd et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:1759-1764.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Corneal wound malapposition after penetrating keratoplasty: an optical coherence tomography study
Kaiserman et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:1103-1107.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Comparison of Wound Healing in Sutured and Unsutured Corneal Wounds
Melles and Binder
Arch Ophthalmol 1990;108:1460-1469.
ABSTRACT  

Penetrating Keratoplasty
Waring
Arch Ophthalmol 1984;102:1121-1121.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1983 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.