You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 115 No. 9, September 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CLINICAL SCIENCES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Evaluation of Microbiological Diagnostic Techniques in Postoperative Endophthalmitis in the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study

Michael Barza, MD; Peter Reed Pavan, MD; Bernard H. Doft, MD; Stephen R. Wisniewski, PhD; Louis A. Wilson, MD; Dennis P. Han, MD; Sheryl F. Kelsey, PhD; Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study Group

Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115(9):1142-1150.


Abstract

Objective
To analyze the data for cultures and Gram stains prospectively collected by protocol in the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study.

Design
Cultures of aqueous, undiluted vitreous, and (for patients who underwent vitrectomy) vitrectomy cassette fluid obtained from 420 patients were prepared on chocolate agar, in thioglycolate broth, and on Sabouraud dextrose agar; Gram stains of the aqueous and undiluted vitreous were made. Criteria were devised to distinguish true pathogens (confirmed positive cultures) from contaminants.

Setting
Private and university-based retina-vitreous practices and corresponding microbiology laboratories.

Results
Compared with the aqueous, undiluted vitreous produced a higher percentage of confirmed positive cultures and higher colony counts on chocolate agar and was more frequently the only source of a positive culture from the eye. Nevertheless, the aqueous and vitrectomy cassette fluid were the only source of a positive culture from the eye in 4.2% and 8.9% of eyes, respectively. The overall yields of chocolate agar and thioglycolate broth were similar. A positive Gram stain from the aqueous or undiluted vitreous was highly predictive of a positive culture from the eye, but a negative Gram stain had little predictive value for the culture result. The overall rate of laboratory-confirmed infection was not statistically significantly higher in the vitrectomy group than in the tap or biopsy group.

Conclusions
The vitreous was a richer source of positive cultures and high colony counts than was the aqueous, either because it is more supportive of bacterial growth or because a somewhat larger inoculum of the vitreous than of aqueous could be obtained. The result of Gram stain should not determine the choice of antibiotic drugs in the treatment of endophthalmitis. Vitrectomy, with culture of the vitrectomy cassette fluid, did not produce significantly more positive cultures than tap or biopsy material, and the procedure should not be performed to improve the microbiological yield.



Author Affiliations

From the Tupper Research Institute and the Division of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, New England Medical Center, Boston, Mass (Dr Barza); University of South Florida, Tampa (Dr Pavan); Retina-Vitreous Consultants (Dr Doft) and Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh (Drs Wisniewski and Kelsey), Pittsburgh, Pa; Emory Eye Center, Atlanta, Ga (Dr Wilson); and Department of Ophthalmology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (Dr Han). A list of the members of the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study group was published in the Archives of Ophthalmology. 1995;113:1479-1496.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

New test for the diagnosis of bacterial endophthalmitis
Goldschmidt et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93:1089-1095.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

An Unexpected Experimental Pitfall in the Molecular Diagnosis of Bacterial Endophthalmitis
Ugahary et al.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004;42:5403-5405.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Fungal and Parasitic Infections of the Eye
Klotz et al.
Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2000;13:662-685.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Detection of and Discrimination between Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacteria in Intraocular Samples by Using Nested PCR
Carroll et al.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 2000;38:1753-1757.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of bacterial endophthalmitis
Therese et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 1998;82:1078-1082.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.