You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 116 No. 9, September 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Epidemiology and Biostatistics
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (17)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Eye Injuries/ Ocular Trauma
 •Emergency Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Patterns of Emergency Department Visits for Disorders of the Eye and Ocular Adnexa

Eric A. Nash, MD; Curtis E. Margo, MD, MPH

Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:1222-1226.

Objective  To characterize the magnitude and patterns of visits to the emergency department (ED) for problems related to the eye and ocular adnexa.

Methods  The National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey was used to obtain information on ED visits in the United States for conditions of the eye and ocular adnexa in 1993. Patients were identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, codes. National projections were based on a staged probability design.

Results  There were 2.32 million projected ED visits for problems of the eye and ocular adnexa in 1993. Forty-nine percent of visits were for injuries, two thirds of which occurred in males. Thirty-five percent of injuries occurred in the home and 18% occurred in the workplace. Only 3% of patients required hospitalization. Most patients had private insurance, but substantial variations in coverage existed for patients who used the ED for injury- vs non–injury-related care.

Conclusions  Emergency departments in the United States provide a large amount of eye care, much of which is for conditions other than trauma. Differences in insurance coverage for injury- and non–injury-related eye care indicate that factors other than medical urgency are involved in the decision to use ED services. Further studies are needed to determine the cost-effectiveness and quality of ocular-related ED visits.


From the Departments of Ophthalmology (Drs Nash and Margo) and Pathology (Dr Margo), University of South Florida, College of Medicine, Tampa. Dr Margo is now with the Department of Ophthalmology, Watson Clinic, Lakeland, Fla.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Trends in Eye Injury in the United States, 1992-2001
McGwin et al.
IOVS 2006;47:521-527.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Rate of Eye Injury in the United States
McGwin et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:970-976.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Incidence of Emergency Department-Treated Eye Injury in the United States
McGwin and Owsley
Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:662-666.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hospitalization for Nontraumatic Disorders of the Eye and Ocular Adnexa: Analysis of the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration Data Set
Mulla and Margo
Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:262-266.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hospitals Without Eye Surgery: Are Minimum Standards of Care Being Met for Patients With Ocular Injury?
Margo
Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:1851-1853.
FULL TEXT  

The Nature, Incidence, and Impact of Eye Injuries Among US Military Personnel: Implications for Prevention
Andreotti et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:1693-1697.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.