You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 119 No. 4, April 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Special Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Informatics/ Internet in Medicine
 •Medical Informatics
 •Informatics, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Considerations for Choosing an Electronic Medical Record for an Ophthalmology Practice

Peter W. DeBry, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:590-596.

Objectives  To give a brief overview of issues pertinent to selecting an ophthalmic electronic medical record (EMR) program and to outline the company demographics and software capabilities of the major vendors in this area.

Methods  Software companies shipping an EMR package were contacted to obtain information on their software and company demographics. The focus was on companies selectively marketing to ophthalmology practices, and, therefore, most were selected based on their representation at the 1998 and/or 1999 American Academy of Ophthalmology meeting. Software companies that responded to repeated inquiries in a timely fashion were included.

Results  Sixteen companies were evaluated. Electronic medical records packages ranged from $3000 to $80 000 (mean, approximately $30 000). Company demographics revealed a range from 1 to 1600 employees (mean, 204). Most of these companies have been in business for 6 years or less (range, 1-15 years; mean, 6 years). My opinions concerning various aspects of the EMR are presented.

Conclusions  There is a wide range of EMR products available for the ophthalmology practice. Computer technology has matured to a point at which the graphical demands of the ophthalmology EMR can be satisfied. Weaknesses do exist in the inherent difficulty of recording an ophthalmology encounter, the relative adolescence of software companies, and the lack of standards in the industry.


From the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison. Dr DeBry is now with Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, Fla.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

An Electronic Medical Records System for Clinical Research and the EMR EDC Interface
Murphy et al.
IOVS 2007;48:4383-4389.
FULL TEXT  

Electronic Health Records in Specialty Care: A Time-Motion Study
Lo et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2007;14:609-615.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.