This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (27)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Diabetic Retinopathy  • Macular Disorders  • Articles for Residents  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Comparison of Measurements Obtained by Retinal Thickness Analysis and Optical Coherence Tomography

Isabel Pires, MD; Rui C. Bernardes, MSc; Conceição L. Lobo, MD, PhD; Mário A. Soares, Tech; José G. Cunha-Vaz, MD, PhD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:1301-1306.

Objective  To compare measurements of retinal thickness in eyes with mild nonproliferative retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using 2 different techniques: the retinal thickness analyzer (RTA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT).

Methods  Twenty-eight eyes from 28 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and mild nonproliferative retinopathy were classified according to the Wisconsin grading system by 7-field stereoscopic fundus photography. Ten eyes were classified as level 10 (absence of visible lesions) and 18 as level 20 or 35 (minimal retinopathy). All eyes were examined by the RTA and OCT. Healthy populations were used to establish reference maps for the RTA (n = 14; mean age, 48 years; age range, 42-55 years) and OCT (n = 10; mean age, 56 years; age range, 43-68 years). Reference maps were computed using the means + 2 SDs of the values obtained for each location. Increases in thickness were computed as a percentage of increase over these reference maps.

Results  The RTA detected increases in thickness in 1 or more locations in 24 of the 28 diabetic eyes examined, whereas OCT detected increases in only 3 eyes. The percentages of increase detected by the RTA ranged from 0.3% to 73.5%, whereas OCT detected percentages of increase of 0.3% to 4.8%.

Conclusion  Optical coherence tomography is less sensitive than the RTA in detecting localized increases in retinal thickness in the initial stages of diabetic retinal disease.

From the Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Coimbra (Drs Pires, Lobo, and Cunha-Vaz and Ms Soares), the Center of New Technologies for Medicine (Mr Bernardes and Dr Cunha-Vaz), Association for Biomedical Research and Innovation on Light and Image (Dr Cunha-Vaz), and the Institute of Biomedical Research on Light and Image, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra (Drs Lobo and Cunha-Vaz), Coimbra, Portugal.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Increased-Resolution OCT Thickness Mapping of the Human Macula: A Statistically Based Registration
Bernardes et al.
IOVS 2008;49:2046-2052.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Decreased optical coherence tomography-measured pericentral retinal thickness in patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 with minimal diabetic retinopathy
Biallosterski et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91:1135-1138.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A reference standard for the measurement of macular oedema.
Goatman
Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:1197-1202.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Objective Retinal Thickness Analysis and Subjective Stereo Fundus Photography in Diabetic Macular Edema
Strom and Sander
IOVS 2004;45:1450-1455.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Tele-Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy With the Retinal Thickness Analyzer
Neubauer et al.
Diabetes Care 2003;26:2890-2897.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Interpretation of Objectively Acquired Retinal Thickness Values--Reply
Bernardes and Cunha-Vaz
Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:1344-1345.
FULL TEXT  

Interpretation of Objectively Acquired Retinal Thickness Values
Hudson et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:1343-1344.
FULL TEXT