You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 120 No. 6, June 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Socioeconomics and Health Services
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (36)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Use of Eye Care and Associated Charges Among the Medicare Population

1991-1998

Leon B. Ellwein, PhD; Carol J. Urato, MA

Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:804-811.

Objective  To examine trends in the utilization and cost of eye care in the Medicare population.

Methods  Data were obtained from fee-for-service physician claims (Part B) from a 5% sample of Medicare beneficiaries 65 years and older. Use of eye care services and procedures, frequency of ocular diagnoses, and allowed charges were compared for each year from 1991 through 1998.

Results  The proportion of beneficiaries receiving eye care increased from 41.4% to 48.1% during the 8-year period. Part B charges attributable to eye care decreased from 12.5% to 10.4%, with annual inflation-adjusted charges per beneficiary decreasing from $235 to $176 (1998 dollars). The proportion of beneficiaries with cataract-related claims increased from 23.4% to 27.3%, accounting for approximately 60% of eye care charges each year; beneficiaries with retinal disease claims increased from 7.8% to 11.4%, capturing 15.4% of eye care charges in 1998, up from 10.7% in 1991; and beneficiaries with glaucoma claims increased from 6.8% to 9.5%, accounting for nearly 10% of eye care charges each year.

Conclusions  The proportion of the Medicare population receiving eye care increased between 1991 and 1998. Nevertheless, eye care costs did not increase, primarily because of constraints in charges associated with the management of cataract.


From the National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (Dr Ellwein); and Health Economics Research Inc, Waltham, Mass (Ms Urato).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Risk of Cataract after Exposure to Low Doses of Ionizing Radiation: A 20-Year Prospective Cohort Study among US Radiologic Technologists
Chodick et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2008;168:620-631.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of Vision Loss on Costs and Outcomes in Medicare Beneficiaries With Glaucoma
Bramley et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:849-856.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Self-Reported Age-Related Eye Diseases and Visual Impairment in the United States: Results of the 2002 National Health Interview Survey
Ryskulova et al.
Am. J. Public Health 2008;98:454-461.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Associations Between Age-Related Nuclear Cataract and Lutein and Zeaxanthin in the Diet and Serum in the Carotenoids in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (CAREDS), an Ancillary Study of the Women's Health Initiative
Moeller et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:354-364.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Estimating the Rate of Progressive Visual Field Damage in Those with Open-Angle Glaucoma, from Cross-Sectional Data
Broman et al.
IOVS 2008;49:66-76.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Access to Eye Care: Response of the American Academy of Ophthalmology and Its Members to Societal Needs Now and in the Future
Lee et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:403-405.
FULL TEXT  

The Economic Burden of Major Adult Visual Disorders in the United States
Rein et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124:1754-1760.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Self assessed benefit of cataract extraction
Congdon
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2005;89:931-931.
FULL TEXT  

The cost of glucocorticoid-associated adverse events in rheumatoid arthritis
Pisu et al.
Rheumatology (Oxford) 2005;44:781-788.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cataract surgery and subtype in a defined, older population: the SEECAT Project
Lewis et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2004;88:1512-1517.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Nuclear Cataract Shows Significant Familial Aggregation in an Older Population after Adjustment for Possible Shared Environmental Factors
Congdon et al.
IOVS 2004;45:2182-2186.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevalence of Cataract and Pseudophakia/Aphakia Among Adults in the United States
The Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group
Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:487-494.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Important Causes of Visual Impairment in the World Today
Congdon et al.
JAMA 2003;290:2057-2060.
FULL TEXT  

Longitudinal Prevalence of Major Eye Diseases
Lee et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:1303-1310.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.