 |
 |

Interexpert Agreement of Plus Disease Diagnosis in Retinopathy of Prematurity
Michael F. Chiang, MD, MA;
Lei Jiang, BA;
Rony Gelman, MD;
Yunling E. Du, PhD;
John T. Flynn, MD
Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125(7):875-880.
Objective To measure agreement of plus disease diagnosis among retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) experts.
Methods A set of 34 wide-angle retinal photographs from infants with ROP was compiled on a secure Web site and was interpreted independently by 22 recognized ROP experts. Diagnostic agreement was analyzed using 3-level (plus, pre-plus, or neither) and 2-level (plus or not plus) categorizations.
Results In the 3-level categorization, all experts agreed on the same diagnosis in 4 of 34 images (12%), and the mean weighted statistic for each expert compared with all others was between 0.21 and 0.40 (fair agreement) for 7 experts (32%) and between 0.41 and 0.60 (moderate agreement) for 15 experts (68%). In the 2-level categorization, all experts who provided a diagnosis agreed in 7 of 34 images (21%), and the mean statistic for each expert compared with all others was between 0 and 0.20 (slight agreement) for 1 expert (5%), between 0.21 and 0.40 (fair agreement) for 3 experts (14%), between 0.41 and 0.60 (moderate agreement) for 12 experts (55%), and between 0.61 and 0.80 (substantial agreement) for 6 experts (27%).
Conclusions Interexpert agreement of plus disease diagnosis is imperfect. This may have important implications for clinical ROP management, continued refinement of the international ROP classification system, development of computer-based diagnostic algorithms, and implementation of ROP telemedicine systems.
Author Affiliations: Departments of Ophthalmology (Drs Chiang, Gelman, and Flynn and Mr Jiang) and Biomedical Informatics (Dr Chiang), Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine (Dr Du), New York, New York.
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED LETTERS
Flawed Study Design in Report on Interexpert Agreement of Plus Disease Diagnosis in Retinopathy of Prematurity
William V. Good, Earl A. Palmer, and Robert J. Hardy
Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(5):740.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Flawed Study Design in Report on Interexpert Agreement of Plus Disease Diagnosis in Retinopathy of Prematurity—Reply
Michael F. Chiang, Lei Jiang, Rony Gelman, Yunling E. Du, and John T. Flynn
Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(5):740-741.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED ARTICLE
It's Plus Disease, Isn't It?
Dale L. Phelps
Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125(7):963-964.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Technological Advances in Pediatric Eye Care
Wallace et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:805-806.
FULL TEXT
Retinopathy of prematurity
Wilson and Fielder
BMJ 2008;337:a2648-a2648.
FULL TEXT
Stanford University Network for Diagnosis of Retinopathy of Prematurity (SUNDROP): 12-month experience with telemedicine screening
Murakami et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:1456-1460.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Systematic Review of Digital Imaging Screening Strategies for Retinopathy of Prematurity
Kemper et al.
Pediatrics 2008;122:825-830.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Plus Disease in Retinopathy of Prematurity: Development of Composite Images by Quantification of Expert Opinion
Chiang et al.
IOVS 2008;49:4064-4070.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Computerized Analysis of Retinal Vessel Width and Tortuosity in Premature Infants
Wilson et al.
IOVS 2008;49:3577-3585.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Flawed Study Design in Report on Interexpert Agreement of Plus Disease Diagnosis in Retinopathy of Prematurity
Good et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:740-740.
FULL TEXT
Flawed Study Design in Report on Interexpert Agreement of Plus Disease Diagnosis in Retinopathy of Prematurity--Reply
Chiang et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:740-741.
FULL TEXT
Cost-Utility Analysis of Telemedicine and Ophthalmoscopy for Retinopathy of Prematurity Management
Jackson et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:493-499.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
It's Plus Disease, Isn't It?
Phelps
Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:963-964.
FULL TEXT
|