You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 126 No. 6, June 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Laboratory Sciences
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Corneal Disorders
 •Laser Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Femtosecond Laser Top Hat Penetrating Keratoplasty

Wound Burst Pressures of Incomplete Cuts

Penny McAllum, MBChB, FRANZCO; Igor Kaiserman, MD, MSc, MHA; Irit Bahar, MD; David Rootman, MD, FRCSC

Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(6):822-825.

Objective  To investigate the pressure required to rupture femtosecond laser top hat configuration corneal dissections with incomplete dissections.

Methods  Twenty corneoscleral buttons underwent femtosecond laser top hat configuration dissections. Group A had complete dissections; group B, 100-µm gaps in the anterior side cut; group C, 50-µm gaps in the anterior side cut; group D, 100-µm gaps in the lamellar cut; and group E, 50-µm gaps in the lamellar cut. The pressure required to rupture each cornea was measured.

Results  The mean (SD) pressure required to rupture the corneas was 111 (74) mm Hg for group A, 1565 (509) mm Hg for group B, 747 (209) mm Hg for group C, 550 (303) mm Hg for group D, and 392 (166) mm Hg for group E (P = .03 for all compared with group A).

Conclusions  Incomplete femtosecond laser top hat dissections are highly resistant to rupture by direct pressurization. Gaps in the anterior side cuts are stronger than comparably sized gaps in the lamellar cuts.

Clinical Relevance  Undertaking femtosecond laser keratoplasty in a 2-site setting should, theoretically, have a high level of safety. Burst pressures are high enough to resist an inadvertent sudden increase in intraocular pressure providing that incomplete recipient laser dissections are undertaken.


Author Affiliations: Department of Ophthalmology, Toronto Western Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.