You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 126 No. 8, August 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Sciences
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Dry Eye Syndromes
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Evaluation of Topical Cyclosporine for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease

Henry D. Perry, MD; Renée Solomon, MD; Eric D. Donnenfeld, MD; Alicia R. Perry, BA; John R. Wittpenn, MD; Herb E. Greenman, MD; Howard E. Savage, PhD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(8):1046-1050.

Objective  To evaluate the use of topical cyclosporine, 0.05% (Restasis; Allergan Inc, Irvine, California), for the treatment of mild, moderate, and severe dry eye disease unresponsive to artificial tears therapy.

Methods  This was a prospective clinical study. One hundred fifty-eight consecutive patients with dry eye disease unresponsive to artificial tears therapy were divided into 3 groups of disease severity: mild, moderate, and severe. Patients were evaluated using the Ocular Surface Disease Index for symptomatic improvement, tear breakup time, fluorescein staining, lissamine green staining, and Schirmer testing. Patients were observed for 3 to 16 months. The main outcome measure was improvement in disease.

Results  Forty-six of 62 patients with mild dry eye disease (74.1%), 50 of 69 with moderate disease (72.4%), and 18 of 27 with severe disease (66.7%) showed improvement, with 72.1% improving overall.

Conclusions  Topical cyclosporine shows beneficial effects in all categories of dry eye disease. Symptomatic improvement was greatest in the mild group and the best results in improvement of disease signs were in patients with severe dry eye disease.


Author Affiliations: Ophthalmic Consultants of Long Island (Drs Perry, Solomon, Donnenfeld, Wittpenn, and Greenman and Ms Perry), New York Eye and Ear Infirmary (Drs Perry and Savage), and Manhattan Eye, Ear and Throat Hospital (Dr Donnenfeld), New York, New York.







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.