You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 126 No. 9, September 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Trial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •eFigures
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Cataracts/ Lens
 •Macular Disorders
 •Uveitis
 •Ophthalmological Procedures, Other
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Drug Therapy
 •Adverse Effects
 •Alert me on articles by topic


Treatment of Posterior Uveitis With a Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant

Three-Year Clinical Trial Results

David G. Callanan, MD; Glenn J. Jaffe, MD; Daniel F. Martin, MD; P. Andrew Pearson, MD; Timothy L. Comstock, OD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(9):1191-1201.

Objectives  To evaluate the safety and efficacy of 0.59-mg and 2.1-mg fluocinolone acetonide (FA) intravitreous implants in noninfectious posterior uveitis.

Design  A 3-year, multicenter, randomized, historically controlled trial of the 0.59-mg FA intravitreous implant in 110 patients and the 2.1-mg FA intravitreous implant in 168 patients.

Main Outcome Measures  Recurrence rate, vision, and complications.

Results  Uveitis recurrence was reduced in implanted eyes from 62% (during the 1-year preimplantation period) to 4%, 10%, and 20% during the 1-, 2-, and 3-year postimplantation periods, respectively, for the 0.59-mg dose group (P < .01) and from 58% to 7%, 17%, and 41%, respectively, for the 2.1-mg dose group (P < .01). More implanted eyes than nonimplanted eyes had improved visual acuity (P < .01). Implanted eyes had higher incidences of intraocular pressure elevation (≥ 10 mm Hg) than nonimplanted eyes (P < .01), and glaucoma surgery was required in 40% of implanted eyes vs 2% of nonimplanted eyes (P < .01). Cataracts were extracted in 93% of phakic implanted eyes vs 20% of phakic nonimplanted eyes (P < .01).

Conclusions  The FA implant significantly reduced uveitis recurrence and improved or stabilized visual acuity in subjects with noninfectious posterior uveitis. Most subjects required cataract extraction, and a significant proportion required intraocular pressure–lowering surgery.

Application to Clinical Practice  The FA implant provides an alternative therapy for prolonged control of inflammation in noninfectious posterior uveitis.

Trial Registration  clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00407082


Author Affiliations: Texas Retina Associates, Arlington, and University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas (Dr Callanan); Duke University Eye Center, Durham, North Carolina (Dr Jaffe); Emory Eye Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia (Dr Martin); Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Dr Pearson); and Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, New York (Dr Comstock).


RELATED ARTICLE

Fluocinolone Acetonide for the Treatment of Uveitis: Weighing the Balance Between Local and Systemic Immunosuppression
Steven Yeh and Robert B. Nussenblatt
Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(9):1287-1289.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Fluocinolone Acetonide for the Treatment of Uveitis: Weighing the Balance Between Local and Systemic Immunosuppression
Yeh and Nussenblatt
Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:1287-1289.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.