This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on Web of Science (1)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Laser Surgery  • Refractive Surgery  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:269-270.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

A 48-year-old healthy white man underwent bilateral epikeratophakia in 1986 for high myopia. After several months, his refraction regressed slightly and his right cornea developed central haze. He then had photorefractive keratectomy in both eyes for myopia and phototherapeutic keratectomy in the right eye to reduce the corneal haze, which was not successful. Therefore, in March of 1999, the epikeratophakia lenticle was removed from the right cornea to reduce the central corneal haze.

The patient was initially seen in June 2002 for a laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) consult. At that time, the patient’s uncorrected vision was counting fingers OU. Best-corrected vision in the right eye was 20/20 – 1 with a dry refraction of –7.25 – 2.50 x 180 and 20/20 with a cycloplegic refraction of –7.00 – 1.00 x 180; in the left eye, it was 20/30 + 2 with a dry refraction of –8.50 – 2. 00 x 165 and 20/30 + 2 with a cycloplegic refraction of –8.00 – 2.00 . . . [Full Text of this Article]

AUTHOR INFORMATION
Eileen Conti, MD

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?