This Article  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Vitreoretinal Surgery  • Alert me on articles by topic

Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:1537-1538.

Histologic and immunohistochemical preparation of pathologic fluids containing cellular material is difficult, because the techniques are limited by the amount of cellular material. Similar problems limit the preparation of vitrectomized material. Cytopreparatory techniques, including millipore filter and celloidin bag cell block, have been introduced since 1980 for diagnostic vitrectomies.^1-2 These techniques are limited by the fact that the specimens cannot be stained using different histologic and immunohistochemical techniques. A second disadvantage of these techniques is that long-term storage of obtained material for later histologic evaluation is not possible. Direct paraffin embedding of vitrectomized specimens is possible, but specimens with low cell numbers are difficult to prepare.^3-4

Kawan et al⁵ introduced a brush cell block technique for diagnosis of bronchial neoplasms, in which histologic evaluation of the tissue can be performed with a small amount of aspirated cells. Herein, we introduce a modification of the technique by Kawan et al⁵ to embed vitrectomized material in paraffin.

Methods
Eyes from 101 patients underwent vitrectomy for different pathologic indications (Table 1). The operating technique was similar in all patients.⁶ Diluted vitreous material was obtained from the receptacle attached to the aspiration line at the end of a pars plana vitrectomy and then centrifuged at 3000 revolutions per minute for 10 minutes. The collected pellet was mixed with sodium citrate plasma (1:1, Ci-Trol; Dade Behring, Vienna, Austria). Afterward, the same amount of thromboplastin (Thromborel S; Dade Behring) was added to the pellet. The material was then coagulated to a fibrin block and the block centrifuged at 3000 revolutions per minute for 5 minutes and fixed in 10% buffered formaldehyde for 1 hour (Figure 1). The block was embedded in paraffin wax with a melting point of 58°C to 60°C (Histosec; Merck, Vienna, Austria). Five-micrometer sectioning was performed. Routine hematoxylin-eosin, periodic acid–Schiff, and Masson trichrome staining was performed in all cases. Depending on the clinical diagnosis, immunohistochemical staining for CD3, CD20, CD45, S100, and HMB45 (Table 2) was performed. This latter technique has been previously described.⁷

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window] Table 1. Clinical Diagnoses of the Patients Undergoing Vitrectomy

View larger version (203K): [in this window] [in a new window] Figure 1. Vitreous specimen as a fibrin block (arrow) in 10% buffered formaldehyde.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window] Table 2. Antibodies Used for Immunohistochemical Staining

Results
Examples of routine histologic and immunohistochemical staining are shown in Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, and Figure 5. Paraffin embedding of vitrectomy material was performed easily in all cases. The tissue may be prepared and sectioned within hours.

View larger version (114K): [in this window] [in a new window] Figure 2. Vitrectomy specimen from a patient with chorioretinitis showing few lymphocytes and neutrophils (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification x250).

View larger version (146K): [in this window] [in a new window] Figure 3. Vitrectomy material from the same patient in Figure 2 showing cells of the nuclear layer of the retina (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification x250).

View larger version (145K): [in this window] [in a new window] Figure 4. Positive staining of melanoma cells for HMB45 from a patient with uveal melanoma (streptavidin-biotin, original magnification x250).

View larger version (117K): [in this window] [in a new window] Figure 5. Vitrectomy specimen from a patient with diabetic retinopathy showing erythrocytes and fibrotic tissue (Masson trichrome, original magnification x100).

Routine histologic examination following hematoxylin-eosin, periodic acid–Schiff, and Masson trichrome staining demonstrated excellent morphologic differentiation of the vitrectomized cells. Immunohistochemical staining showed good staining quality and morphologic delineation. Using the appropriate antibody concentration, background staining was not observed.

Comment
The paraffin embedding technique of vitrectomized material introduced herein is an easy and fast method for paraffin embedding of intraocular fluids, even with a small number of cells. The technique enables ophthalmic pathologists who are not experienced with vitreous samples to handle this material easily.

In contrast, direct paraffin embedding of vitrectomized specimens requires a large number of cells, as in cases of vitreous hemorrhage, endophthalmitis, or diabetic retinopathy. In these instances, a considerable amount of cells will be lost.^3-4

Paraffin embedding of vitrectomized intraocular fluids using the fibrin and paraffin method has the following important advantages. Specimens with small numbers of cells from patients with macular pucker or retinal detachment without hemorrhage can be analyzed using all histologic techniques, including immunohistochemical analysis, which is not possible with cytopreparation techniques. The second major advantage is the possibility of archiving specimens for future studies.

The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.

We thank Arthur Fu, MD, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, England, for critical reading of the manuscript.

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Navid Ardjomand, MD; Anna M. Theisl, MTA; Jürgen Faulborn, MD

Correspondence: Dr Ardjomand, Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 4, 8036 Graz, Austria (navid.ardjomand{at}meduni-graz.at).

REFERENCES
1. Bussolati G. A celloidin bag for the histological preparation of cytologic material. J Clin Pathol. 1982;35:574-576. FREE FULL TEXT 2. Engel HM, Green WR, Michels RG, Rice TA, Erozan YS. Diagnostic vitrectomy. Retina. 1981;1:121-149. PUBMED 3. Martin F, Pastor JC, Saornil MA, et al. Comparison of different techniques for cytologic analysis of vitreous specimens [in Spanish]. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2001;76:723-730. PUBMED 4. Rodriguez De La Rua E, Martin F, Saornil MA, Fernandez N, Pastor JC. Efficacy of direct paraffin embedding in cytological analysis of vitreous from proliferative vitreo-retinopathy (PVR) [in Spanish]. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2001;76:655-660. PUBMED 5. Kawan E, Ulrich W, Redtenbacher S, Schreiber B, Zwick H. Kawan bronchial brush/cell block technique: facilitation of the routine diagnosis of bronchial neoplasms. Acta Cytol. 1998;42:1409-1413. PUBMED 6. Haritoglou C, Gass CA, Schaumberger M, et al. Long-term follow-up after macular hole surgery with internal limiting membrane peeling. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;134:661-666. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED 7. Ardjomand N, Ardjomand N, Schaffler G, Radner H, El-Shabrawi Y. Expression of somatostatin receptors in uveal melanomas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:980-987. FREE FULL TEXT

SECTION EDITOR: W. RICHARD GREEN, MD