You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 122 No. 2, February 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinicopathologic Reports, Case Reports, and Small Case Series
 This Article
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Laser Surgery
 •Refractive Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Successful Corneal Flap Replacement Following Complete Traumatic Flap Amputation After Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis

Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:275-276.

Traumatic corneal flap displacement is an uncommon complication following laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Most reported traumatic flap displacements are partial and can subsequently be repositioned with satisfactory results.1-4 Occasionally, however, significant force may completely avulse the corneal flap, resulting in a lost flap.5-6 Complete loss of the flap may cause significant haze and loss of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity.5 To our knowledge, no successful replacement of a lost corneal flap due to LASIK has previously been reported. In this case report, we describe a technique resulting in successful replacement of a lost corneal flap following LASIK.

Report of a Case.

A 59-year-old woman was referred following replacement of the corneal flap after complete flap avulsion 5 months after an uncomplicated LASIK procedure. Two days previously, she had been hit with a tree branch. She was immediately evaluated by her primary ophthalmologist who noted the absence of the corneal flap. The patient returned to the site of injury to look for the lost flap. The flap was found on the ground approximately 8 hours after the trauma and was replaced by her primary ophthalmologist with a bandage contact lens. She was prescribed 0.3% ofloxacin (Allergan, Irvine, Calif) every hour and 0.5% loteprednol etabonate (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY) every 6 hours and referred to the Department of Ophthalmology at Stanford University (Stanford, Calif) the following day.

At her initial examination at Stanford University, the patient's uncorrected visual acuity was 20/200 in the affected eye. An anterior segment examination revealed a superior hinged flap that was misaligned nasally (90° off-axis). The bandage contact lens was in place. There was evidence of diffuse conjunctival injection, eyelid edema, grade 3 diffuse lamellar keratitis, interface debris, epithelial ingrowth, and diffuse macrostriae (Figure 1). There was no evidence of a focal infiltrate, ulceration, hypopyon, or melting.



View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 1. Initial evidence of diffuse lamellar keratitis and epithelial ingrowth.


The patient underwent flap lifting; removal of flap debris, interface inflammatory cells, and epithelial ingrowth; culture of the interface; flap realignment; and flap suturing with 8 interrupted 10-0 nylon sutures (Figure 2). The bandage contact lens was replaced, and the patient was given 0.3% ofloxacin every 6 hours, 1.0% prednisolone acetate every hour, and oral prednisone at a dosage of 50 mg/d for 3 days. There was no recurrence of epithelial ingrowth or diffuse lamellar keratitis. Culture results remained negative. All sutures were removed on postoperative day 11. The prednisolone was tapered, and the ofloxacin treatment was discontinued. At postoperative month 8, there was mild interface haze (Figure 3). In the affected eye, the uncorrected visual acuity was 20/25, and the best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was 20/20 with a refractive error of -0.50 D + 0.75 D x 72.



View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 2. Suture of the flap with multiple interrupted nylon sutures.




View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 3. At postoperative month 8, the flap is well positioned with only mild interface haze.



Comment.

Previous methods of correcting a completely avulsed corneal flap following LASIK have been limited to epithelial supportive measures including application of a bandage contact lens, topical steroids to minimize haze, prophylactic topical antibiotics, lubrication, and vigilant observation to detect secondary infection. Although the lamellar flap is thought to be refractive neutral, secondary haze or irregular astigmatism may cause complications in these eyes.5-6 However, if the amputated flap is found, consideration can be given to replacement of the flap. The free cap should be carefully inspected to evaluate whether it is still viable. If the integrity of the free cap has been excessively compromised (ie, traumatically shredded) or it has become necrotic, it should not be replaced. If it remains viable, any epithelialization of the stromal bed should be carefully removed, and the free corneal flap should be cultured, irrigated, and replaced with or without sutures. Suturing the flap may prevent epithelial ingrowth and assist in stretching the previously folded flap to prevent striae formation. Caution should be exercised to prevent misalignment of the flap or replacing the flap with the epithelial side down. Misalignment of the flap may not only result in irregular astigmatism but also predispose the patient to the development of epithelial ingrowth. Careful inspection of the flap under high magnification will demonstrate a smooth, shiny surface (Bowman membrane) and a slightly dull, rough surface (stroma). A bandage contact lens is placed over the eye. Prophylactic broad-spectrum antibiotics and topical steroids may also be indicated. During the postoperative period, the culture results should be monitored and the patient should receive daily follow-up to provide the earliest diagnosis of a secondary infection.

The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.


AUTHOR INFORMATION

Weldon W. Haw, MD; Edward E. Manche, MD
Stanford, Calif

Corresponding author and reprints: Edward E. Manche, MD, Stanford University, 900 Blake Wilbur Dr, W3053, Stanford, CA 94305 (e-mail: Edward.Manche{at}stanford.edu).


REFERENCES

1. Schwartz GS, Park DH, Schloff S, Lane SS. Traumatic flap displacement and subsequent diffuse lamellar keratitis after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:781-783. PUBMED
2. Iskander NG, Peters NT, Anderson PE, Gimbel HV. Late traumatic flap dislocation after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:1111-1114. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
3. Geggel HS, Colday MP. Late-onset traumatic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) flap dehiscence. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;131:505-506. PUBMED
4. Melki SA, Talamo JH, Demetriades AM, et al. Late traumatic dislocation of laser in situ keratomileusis corneal flaps. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:2136-2139. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
5. Sridhar MS, Rapuano CJ, Cohen EJ. Accidental self-removal of a flap: a rare complication of laser in situ keratomileusis surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;132:780-782. PUBMED
6. Eggink FA, Eggink CA, Beekhuis WH. Postoperative management and follow-up after corneal flap loss following laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:175-179. PUBMED

SECTION EDITOR: W. RICHARD GREEN, MD







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.