You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 113 No. 9, September 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Correspondence
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Corneal Endothelial Toxic Effect Secondary to Fluorouracil Needle Bleb Revision

Steven Chalfin, MD
San Antonio, Tex

James E. Memmen, MD
Green Bay, Wis

Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113(9):1093-1094.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The report1 of two cases of corneal edema following needle bleb revision and fluorouracil injection illustrates the potential danger of inadvertent intraocular exposure to subconjunctivally administered therapeutic agents. For this reason, our original description of the technique specified injection of 0.5 mL of fluorouracil (10 mg/mL) to balloon the conjunctiva prior to lysis of the fibrous adhesions.2

The use of this technique has not resulted in corneal edema following bleb revision. Whether this is due to the lower concentration of fluorouracil or a decreased amount of reflux into the anterior chamber is not known. One might speculate that by injecting fluorouracil before lysing the adhesions, the predominant direction of fluid flow is egress of aqueous from the anterior chamber.

While other authors have used the higher concentration as an adjunct to bleb revision, these injections were administered starting 1 day after the needling procedure.3 It seems prudent . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.